A Note From Charlie
The High Springs Herald has an update on the goings on in Alachua - and the refusal to provide access to public records in the investigation of the election.
With county official now involved, situation heats up in city of Alachua
By Ronald Dupont Jr.
Herald Editor
There is also an editorial on this there too: Stop the games; show Grapski the documents.
You can also check the Free Alachua blog for updates on situation. The most recent post is Records Continue to be Denied; Business Done Outside the Sunshine.
With county official now involved, situation heats up in city of Alachua
By Ronald Dupont Jr.
Herald Editor
There is also an editorial on this there too: Stop the games; show Grapski the documents.
You can also check the Free Alachua blog for updates on situation. The most recent post is Records Continue to be Denied; Business Done Outside the Sunshine.
posted by Catreona at 5/19/2006 06:30:00 PM
2 Comments:
Listener, the article you ask about is linked in the post. That is, the title of the article, the editorial I mean, is a link. Just put your mouse on it, and the link will show up as such.
Or, clicky:
http://www.highspringsherald.com/articles/2006/05/18/editorial/editorial.txt
BTW sorry for the delay in your comment appearing. The problem has been fixed.
Now, here's something that puzzles me. Why can a member of the purnicious and pesky public be left alone with public records for one hour, but after that must be supervised? If you were going to commit vandelism or theft, or write rude notes on the city's stationery, or whatever, wouldn't you do that in the first hour? What possible use it it to watch a person *after* and *only after* the first hour?
Moreover, why on earth should a member of said public, i.e. a citizen, have to pay for a city employee to babysit him? Neither part of this makes any sense to me.
Post a Comment
<< Home